Ad header

Disability charity says e-cycle bans are an "inappropriate, disproportionate and discriminatory" response to the low fire risk they represent

Author block

Rebecca Morley's picture

Rebecca Morley

Rebecca has been in cycling journalism since 2018. She started out at trade title BikeBiz and still contributes features to its monthly magazine, and was also named one of Cycling UK's 100 Women in Cycling 2019.

3 comments

1 month 1 week ago

I recently saw a video of a domestic fire caused by a dog chewing on a power bank. Batteries don't need to be that big, or be for use with e-bikes to have the potential to start a fire. The important thing is that people understand what contributes towards the potential risks, and how to avoid pitfalls. 

Appropriate standards and good practice for buying, selling, storing and charging ebikes and their batteries need to be developed and widely adopted. 

1 month 1 week ago

The fire risks seem to be restricted to dodgy homebrew ebikes. Bans targeting all ebikes are therefore capturing an awful lot of very low risk bikes. The problem, of course, is coming up with a ban that only targets the homebrew bikes.

1 month 1 week ago

The usual "ban it" after a few incidents happen to bicycles.  Why don't they adopt the same restrictions after similar e-car fires?